Developer Guide for Kafka Streams
Naming Operators in a Kafka Streams DSL Application
You now can give names to processors when using the Kafka Streams DSL.
In the PAPI there are Processors
and State Stores
and
you are required to explicitly name each one.
At the DSL layer, there are operators. A single DSL operator may
compile down to multiple Processors
and State Stores
, and
if required repartition topics
. But with the Kafka Streams
DSL, all these names are generated for you. There is a relationship between
the generated processor name state store names (hence changelog topic names) and repartition
topic names. Note, that the names of state stores and changelog/repartition topics
are "stateful" while processor names are "stateless".
This distinction
of stateful vs. stateless names has important implications when updating your topology.
While the internal naming makes creating
a topology with the DSL much more straightforward,
there are a couple of trade-offs. The first trade-off is what we could
consider a readability issue. The other
more severe trade-off is the shifting of names due to the relationship between the
DSL operator and the generated Processors
, State Stores
changelog
topics and repartition topics.
Readability Issues
By saying there is a readability trade-off, we are referring to viewing a description of the topology.
When you render the string description of your topology via the Topology#describe()
method, you can see what the processor is, but you don't have any context for its business purpose.
For example, consider the following simple topology:
KStream<String,String> stream = builder.stream("input");
stream.filter((k,v) -> !v.equals("invalid_txn"))
.mapValues((v) -> v.substring(0,5))
.to("output");
Running Topology#describe()
yields this string:
Topologies:
Sub-topology: 0
Source: KSTREAM-SOURCE-0000000000 (topics: [input])
--> KSTREAM-FILTER-0000000001
Processor: KSTREAM-FILTER-0000000001 (stores: [])
--> KSTREAM-MAPVALUES-0000000002
<-- KSTREAM-SOURCE-0000000000
Processor: KSTREAM-MAPVALUES-0000000002 (stores: [])
--> KSTREAM-SINK-0000000003
<-- KSTREAM-FILTER-0000000001
Sink: KSTREAM-SINK-0000000003 (topic: output)
<-- KSTREAM-MAPVALUES-0000000002
From this report, you can see what the different operators are, but what is the broader context here?
For example, consider KSTREAM-FILTER-0000000001
, we can see that it's a
filter operation, which means that records are dropped that don't match the given predicate. But what is
the meaning of the predicate? Additionally, you can see the topic names of the source and sink nodes,
but what if the topics aren't named in a meaningful way? Then you're left to guess the
business purpose behind these topics.
Also notice the numbering here: the source node is suffixed with 0000000000
indicating it's the first processor in the topology.
The filter is suffixed with 0000000001
, indicating it's the second processor in
the topology. In Kafka Streams, there are now overloaded methods for
both KStream
and KTable
that accept
a new parameter Named
. By using the Named
class DSL users can
provide meaningful names to the processors in their topology.
Now let's take a look at your topology with all the processors named:
KStream<String,String> stream =
builder.stream("input", Consumed.as("Customer_transactions_input_topic"));
stream.filter((k,v) -> !v.equals("invalid_txn"), Named.as("filter_out_invalid_txns"))
.mapValues((v) -> v.substring(0,5), Named.as("Map_values_to_first_6_characters"))
.to("output", Produced.as("Mapped_transactions_output_topic"));
Topologies:
Sub-topology: 0
Source: Customer_transactions_input_topic (topics: [input])
--> filter_out_invalid_txns
Processor: filter_out_invalid_txns (stores: [])
--> Map_values_to_first_6_characters
<-- Customer_transactions_input_topic
Processor: Map_values_to_first_6_characters (stores: [])
--> Mapped_transactions_output_topic
<-- filter_out_invalid_txns
Sink: Mapped_transactions_output_topic (topic: output)
<-- Map_values_to_first_6_characters
Now you can look at the topology description and easily understand what role each processor
plays in the topology. But there's another reason for naming your processor nodes when you
have stateful operators that remain between restarts of your Kafka Streams applications,
state stores, changelog topics, and repartition topics.
Changing Names
Generated names are numbered where they are built in the topology.
The name generation strategy is
KSTREAM|KTABLE->operator name<->number suffix<
. The number is a
globally incrementing number that represents the operator's order in the topology.
The generated number is prefixed with a varying number of "0"s to create a
string that is consistently 10 characters long.
This means that if you add/remove or shift the order of operations, the position of the
processor shifts, which shifts the name of the processor. Since most processors exist
in memory only, this name shifting presents no issue for many topologies. But the name
shifting does have implications for topologies with stateful operators or repartition topics.
Here's a different topology with some state:
KStream<String,String> stream = builder.stream("input");
stream.groupByKey()
.count()
.toStream()
.to("output");
This topology description yields the following:
Topologies:
Sub-topology: 0
Source: KSTREAM-SOURCE-0000000000 (topics: [input])
--> KSTREAM-AGGREGATE-0000000002
Processor: KSTREAM-AGGREGATE-0000000002 (stores: [KSTREAM-AGGREGATE-STATE-STORE-0000000001])
--> KTABLE-TOSTREAM-0000000003
<-- KSTREAM-SOURCE-0000000000
Processor: KTABLE-TOSTREAM-0000000003 (stores: [])
--> KSTREAM-SINK-0000000004
<-- KSTREAM-AGGREGATE-0000000002
Sink: KSTREAM-SINK-0000000004 (topic: output)
<-- KTABLE-TOSTREAM-0000000003
You can see from the topology description above that the state store is named
KSTREAM-AGGREGATE-STATE-STORE-0000000002
. Here's what happens when you
add a filter to keep some of the records out of the aggregation:
KStream<String,String> stream = builder.stream("input");
stream.filter((k,v)-> v !=null && v.length() >= 6 )
.groupByKey()
.count()
.toStream()
.to("output");
And the corresponding topology:
Topologies:
Sub-topology: 0
Source: KSTREAM-SOURCE-0000000000 (topics: [input])
--> KSTREAM-FILTER-0000000001
Processor: KSTREAM-FILTER-0000000001 (stores: [])
--> KSTREAM-AGGREGATE-0000000003
<-- KSTREAM-SOURCE-0000000000
Processor: KSTREAM-AGGREGATE-0000000003 (stores: [KSTREAM-AGGREGATE-STATE-STORE-0000000002])
--> KTABLE-TOSTREAM-0000000004
<-- KSTREAM-FILTER-0000000001
Processor: KTABLE-TOSTREAM-0000000004 (stores: [])
--> KSTREAM-SINK-0000000005
<-- KSTREAM-AGGREGATE-0000000003
Sink: KSTREAM-SINK-0000000005 (topic: output)
<-- KTABLE-TOSTREAM-0000000004
Notice that since you've added an operation before the count
operation, the state
store (and the changelog topic) names have changed. This name change means you can't
do a rolling re-deployment of your updated topology. Also, you must use the
Streams Reset Tool
to re-calculate the aggregations, because the changelog topic has changed on start-up and the
new changelog topic contains no data.
Fortunately, there's an easy solution to remedy this situation. Give the
state store a user-defined name instead of relying on the generated one,
so you don't have to worry about topology changes shifting the name of the state store.
You've had the ability to name repartition topics with the Joined
,
StreamJoined
, andGrouped
classes, and
name state store and changelog topics with Materialized
.
But it's worth reiterating the importance of naming these DSL topology operations again.
Here's how your DSL code looks now giving a specific name to your state store:
KStream<String,String> stream = builder.stream("input");
stream.filter((k, v) -> v != null && v.length() >= 6)
.groupByKey()
.count(Materialized.as("Purchase_count_store"))
.toStream()
.to("output");
And here's the topology
Topologies:
Sub-topology: 0
Source: KSTREAM-SOURCE-0000000000 (topics: [input])
--> KSTREAM-FILTER-0000000001
Processor: KSTREAM-FILTER-0000000001 (stores: [])
--> KSTREAM-AGGREGATE-0000000002
<-- KSTREAM-SOURCE-0000000000
Processor: KSTREAM-AGGREGATE-0000000002 (stores: [Purchase_count_store])
--> KTABLE-TOSTREAM-0000000003
<-- KSTREAM-FILTER-0000000001
Processor: KTABLE-TOSTREAM-0000000003 (stores: [])
--> KSTREAM-SINK-0000000004
<-- KSTREAM-AGGREGATE-0000000002
Sink: KSTREAM-SINK-0000000004 (topic: output)
<-- KTABLE-TOSTREAM-0000000003
Now, even though you've added processors before your state store, the store name and its changelog topic names don't change. This makes your topology more robust and resilient to changes made by adding or removing processors.
Conclusion
It's a good practice to name your processing nodes when using the DSL, and it's even more important to do this when you have "stateful" processors your application such as repartition topics and state stores (and the accompanying changelog topics).Here are a couple of points to remember when naming your DSL topology:
- If you have an existing topology and you haven't named your state stores (and changelog topics) and repartition topics, we recommended that you do so. But this will be a topology breaking change, so you'll need to shut down all application instances, make the changes, and run the Streams Reset Tool. Although this may be inconvenient at first, it's worth the effort to protect your application from unexpected errors due to topology changes.
- If you have a new topology, make sure you name the persistent parts of your topology: state stores (changelog topics) and repartition topics. This way, when you deploy your application, you're protected from topology changes that otherwise would break your Kafka Streams application. If you don't want to add names to stateless processors at first, that's fine as you can always go back and add the names later.
Operation | Naming Class |
---|---|
Aggregation repartition topics | Grouped |
KStream-KStream Join repartition topics | StreamJoined |
KStream-KTable Join repartition topic | Joined |
KStream-KStream Join state stores | StreamJoined |
State Stores (for aggregations and KTable-KTable joins) | Materialized |
Stream/Table non-stateful operations | Named |